翻訳と辞書 |
Jaftha v Schoeman : ウィキペディア英語版 | Jaftha v Schoeman
''Jaftha v Schoeman and Others, Van Rooyen v Stoltz and Others''〔2005 (1) BCLR 78 (CC).〕 is an important case in South African law, in particular in the area of civil procedure, with its determination that the execution of immovable property is subject to judicial oversight. == Facts == The appellants in two cases had had their homes sold in execution for debts of R250 and R190 respectively. The appellants applied in the High Court for orders setting aside the sales and executions, and interdicting two of the respondents from taking transfer of their homes. The basis of the applications was that the sale-in-execution process was unconstitutional. The High Court dismissed their argument, finding that the applicants could either vacate the premises or remain in occupation. If they chose to stay, the new owners would have to evict them according to in terms of the Prevention of Illegal Eviction and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act and UOLA.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Jaftha v Schoeman」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|